In an Oct. 23 letter to U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., Vilsack said no decisions had been made but the Forest Service could issue a recommendation of “no action,” which could block development of the mine.
Previously, the Forest Service had maintained that under the 1872 Mining Act, mining is a priority for public lands as long as no laws are violated its only option was to take a stance to “mitigate” impacts of a mine.
|
|








Comments