Benson sees opportunity after voters turn down master-planned project

By Philip S. Moore, Inside Tucson Business
Published on Monday, November 27, 2006

Cochise County voters may have yanked the welcome mat out from under Diamond Ventures’ proposed Smith Ranch development west of Benson, but the city would like to roll out the red carpet.

Nurturing plans to transform largely rural Benson’s 5,000 population into a city of 50,000 by 2025, Mayor George Scott said the city is ready and willing to annex the 1,983-acre Smith Ranch site, which now is about four miles west outside the city. Unlike the county, the City of Benson is likely to give the Tucson developer the go-ahead to proceed with plans to transform the property into a 4,900-home master planned community.

Already incorporating Whetstone Ranch, another master-planned community of 10,000 to 12,000 homes, as well as other smaller subdivisions, Scott said growth is not something Benson wants to ignore.

ADVERTISEMENT
“Development is moving our way. We’re in the same position that Casa Grande was in, 20 to 25 years ago,” he said. “Benson is between Tucson and Sierra Vista, just like Casa Grande is between Tucson and Phoenix. People are finding affordable homes here and the 35 to 40 minute drive is not much for those who are coming from Los Angeles and Phoenix.”

The Smith Ranch project is estimated to add $1.6 billion in local income, generating between 3,306 and 4,021 new jobs and $105.8 million in additional local taxes for Benson.

Scott said there are no negotiations currently being held with Diamond Ventures, “but we’d be happy to talk with them.”

Whether the Diamond Ventures is willing to talk to Benson depends on what happens next with Cochise County.

The developer has been involved for more than a year in on-again, off-again discussions about the Smith Ranch property near the Skyline exit of Interstate 10. Although the Cochise County Board of Supervisors approved the project, neighbors have mobilized to oppose its density, which was raised from one home per three-acre lot, to allow for the 4,500 homes. Opponents also raised questions about water use, traffic and run-off.

In a county-wide election Nov. 7, more than 67 percent of voters rejected the rezoning. Ken Abrahams, executive vice president for Diamond Ventures, said the election left with “more questions than answers.”

He said Smith Ranch was designed to meet the county’s goal of encouraging master planned communities with mixed housing types, housing densities and relatively high levels of infrastructure, including roads, sidewalks, public parks and schools. But the rejection, he said, is a change of direction, not just for the development but for all of Cochise County.

“Further community dialogue is required to address how future growth in Cochise County should be accommodated,” he said in a statement. “How will future growth be managed and what patterns of growth and infrastructure will be deemed most appropriate and beneficial? Over time, will very low density development, supported by relatively low levels of infrastructure, be the dominant pattern? Will this pattern of development lead Cochise County forward?”

Benson Mayor Scott said the answers are obvious. While county residents want to preserve the rural environment, he said Benson sees its future along Interstate 10 and State Route 90, which links to Sierra Vista.

“We can provide water to Smith Ranch without affecting their neighbors” and overcome much of the local resistance to the development, Scott said. “We’ve been accused of making secret deals to make this happen, which we haven’t. But, ultimately, I think all of this area will be part of Benson. It just makes sense.”

E-mail comments for publication to editor@azbiz.com. Contact Philip S. Moore by e-mail at pmoore@azbiz.com or call (520) 295-4238.
Previous:
SBA administrator highlights
Next:
What a business wants

Comments

Gail Wilson wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:16 AM:

" Hello
My name is Gail Wilson.
Would you please help me with my son's case? I am sending this to you for "Exposure" if nothing else, please.
The email below was sent 3 days before this Public Defender Robin Lipetkzy "Changed things".

Subject: Re: Jay Shawn Johnson To: "GAIL WILSON" From: "Robin Lipetzky" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:22:16 -0700 Hi Gail- I spoke with the DA again yesterday. I explained that the most that Jay would be willing to do is an additional two to three years. He said they cannot agree to that. So, at this point we will be planning for another trial. The first step is deciding on the right attorney to handle the case within our office. I will be meeting with Jay this morning to discuss the next steps with him. I am extremely disappointed that the DA will not agree to something more reasonable for Jay. I am also determined that we will fight his case in trial with every resource that we have. I'll see you this afternoon. Robin -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone was PLAYING or GOT PLAYED Regarding JAY SHAWN JOHNSON –CASE NO 960691-4 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V JAY SHAWN JOHNSON DEAR ROBIN LIPETZKY, DAVID COLEMAN, RON BOYER, WILLIAM GAGEN,STEPHEN BEDRICK Something very wrong happened on April 25, 2008. I believe ROBIN was playing both sides (Public Defender working for the DA) or ROBIN got played by the District Attorney (according to the DA's quote in the Newspaper). I BELIEVE ROBIN LIPETZKY WAS NOT TRUTHFUL WITH JAY AND INSTEAD OF COUNSELING, ROBIN USED HER POWER OF INFLUENCE, INGRAINED FEAR TO PERSUADE JAY TO ACCEPT THE PLEA. Mr. Gagen and Ron Boyer and let's not forget about Stephen Bedrick (who took this case to the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURTS and WON) all the work that you put into this case. For what, so the ROBIN LIPETZKY and her RELIABLE SOURCE can SPIT ON YOUR EFFORTS. When I spoke with Robin on Friday the 18th of April, I ask if she did not believe in Jay, PLEASE refer the case. I believe Robin has assigned herself as JUDGE AND JURY in respect to Jay's case. THIS IS WRONG. YOU MUST CORRECT THIS NOW. I could not remember everything that I would like to say about Jay and this situation. Jay is a wonderful person. As a child he was my right hand "man" even though he was only five years old. I truly don't know what I would have done without him. His three younger brothers were attached to him and vice versa. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 500 words or fewer.

Comments appear immediately on the site. Editors do review comments periodically during the day, and will remove offensive or off-topic content. You may also report inappropriate comments to the editors. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Tucson Twitter

Tucson Twitter

What is Twitter?

Online Dining Page

Flickr

Online Dining Page

Click to Flickr

Flickr

View our Flickr page

Fresh Business Tips

Fresh Business Tips

View Video Feed

Classifieds


Find Real Estate

Real Estate

View All Real Estate

Find a Vehicle

Automotive

View All Automotive